Theatre in life and works of Marguerite of Navarre
Abstract
The article is devoted to the works of the famous writer of the Renaissance epoch – Marguerite
of Navarre. Her dramatic works have not yet been translated into Russian and there is extremely little information about them in Russian theatre studies. They have no analogues
in the theatre of the first half of the 16th century. Their peculiarity is a combination of the tendencies of late medieval and Renaissance art. On the basis of rare documents and texts
of the plays “The Comedy of the Desert”, “The Inquisitor” and “The Comedy of Mont-deMarsan” the problems of their stage interpretation are considered.
Marguerite of Navarre composed her plays specifically for staging, not for reading.
She was looking for expressive possibilities that had not yet been used by anyone before
her. For many reasons, her experiments were not famous beyond her court. The performances were single, staged in different places where she lived, with different performers,
so that no more or less stable tradition was created in this circle. Therefore, it is impossible
to reconstruct the “theatre of Marguerite of Navarre” as an artistic unit. At the same time,
the originality and even the uniqueness of this material makes it possible to study little-known
aspects of the history of French theatre in the period of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.
Keywords
Marguerite of Navarre, French theatre of the 16th century, “Biblical Comedies”,
“The Comedy of the Desert”, “The Inquisitor”, “The Comedy of Mont-de-Marsan”.
For citation
Nekrasova I. A. Theatre in life and works of Marguerite of Navarre. Theatre. Fine Arts. Cinema. Music. 2022, no. 1, pp. 10–26.
DOI: 10.35852/2588-0144-2022-1-10-26
References
- Eichel-Lojkine P. Marguerite de Navarre. Paris: Perrin, 2021. 350 p.
- Lebègue R. La tragédie religieuse en France: Les débuts (1514–1573). Paris: Champion, 1929. 558 р.
- Marguerite de Navarre. Les comédies bibliques / Ed. critique par B. Marczuk. Genève: Droz, 2000. 353 р.
- Marguerite de Navarre. Les Marguerites de la Marguerite des princesses. Lyon: J. de Tournes, 1547. 541 p.
- Brouardelle N., Onandia В. La Comédie des quatre femmes de Marguerite de Navarre ou les parfums féministes navarriens. Ambigua: Revista de Investigaciones sobre Género y Estudios Culturales. 2019, no. 6, pp. 23–35.
- Marguerite d’Angoulême, reine de Navarre. Les Farces. In: Marguerite d’Angoulême, reine de Navarre L’Heptaméron des nouvelles / Publié par M. Le Roux de Lincy et A. de Montaiglon: in 4 t. Paris: A. Eudes, 1880, t. 4, pp. 1–161.
- Marguerite de Navarre. Théâtre profane / Ed. par V.-L. Saulnier. 2-e ed. Paris: Droz, 1965. XXVI, 358 р.
- Marguerite de Navarre. Œuvres complètes: in 10 t. Paris: Champion, 2002. T. IV. Théâtre / Ed. critique par G. Hasenohr et O. Millet sous la dir. de N. Cazauran. 674 p.
- Théâtre de femmes de l’Ancien Régime: in 4 t. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2014. T. 1. XVIe siècle. 516 p.
- Marguerite d’Angoulême. Lettres / Publ. par F. Génin. Paris: J. Renouard, 1841. XVI. 485 p.
- Millet O. Staging the Spiritual: The Biblical and Non-Biblical Plays // A Companion to Marguerite de Navarre / Ed. by G. Ferguson and M.B. McKinley. Leyden; Boston: Brill, 2013, pp. 281–322.
- Lebègue R. Le Mystère des Actes des Apotres: Contribution à l’étude de l’humanisme et du protestantisme français au XVIe siècle. Paris: Champion, 1929. 274 p.
- Eloy du Mont, dit Costentin. La Resurrection de Jesus Christ par personnages. Available from: https://gallica. bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b9059418j/f2.image.
- Garosci C. Margherita di Navarra. Torino: S. Lattes, 1908. 361 р.
- Duhl O. A. La polémique religieuse dans le théâtre de Marguerite de Navarre // Le théâtre polémique français 1450–1550. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2008, pp. 189–210.
- Аtance F.R. Les comédies profanes de Marguerite de Navarre: aspects de la satire religieuse en France au XVIe siècle // Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuses. 1976, no. 3, pp. 289–313.
- Basso H. La structure de la Comédie de Mont-de-Marsan // Bulletin de l’Association d’étude sur l’humanisme, la Réforme et la Renaissance. 1999, no. 49, pp. 37–54.
Received: 30.11.2021
Revised: 04.02.2022
Accepted: 11.02.2022