• Premonition of disaster: The traditions of Chekhov’s drama in the play by T. L. Shchepkina- Kupernik “Happy Woman”

УДК: 821.161.1.0-2

DOI: 10.35852/2588-0144-2022-2-65-80

Full text (PDF): Download

Irina Yu. Lyubivaya

PhD applicant of the Department of Russian Theatre History, Russian Institute of Theatre Arts (GITIS), Associate professor of the Department of Art History
M.S. Shchepkin Theatre Institute
Moscow, Russia
E-mail: irinna555@mail.ru

Premonition of disaster: The traditions of Chekhov’s drama in the play by T. L. Shchepkina- Kupernik “Happy Woman”

Abstract

Tatyana Lvovna Shchepkina-Kupernik is known as the author of theatrical memoirs and brilliant plays’ translations, but her dramaturgy heritage still lacks the research attention. The article analyzes one of the most striking plays by T.L. Shchepkina-Kupernik “The Happy Woman”. In 1911 it received the Griboyedov award for the best original dramatic play of that theatrical season, though nowadays it is undeservedly forgotten. The article disputes the prevailing idea of the play “The Happy Woman” as a work of exclusively gender themes, focused on the “women’s issue”. The analysis of the play’s poetics (features of the drama conflict, the nature of the dialogues, scenography, the specifics of the author’s remarks, the symbolism of sound images) allows us to conclude that Shchepkina-Kupernik consistently implemented the traditions of Chekhov’s dramaturgy. Certain symbolic overtones are created by the motif of “the lost life”, embodied in the fate of the main character, the emphasized weakness of male characters (focus on a career, superficiality, inability to influence the situation, unavailability). It deepens the content of the dramatic conflict and leads to the tragic outcome, just like in Chekhov’s plays, “not individual people are to blame, but the whole existing composition of life as a whole”. There is a bitter irony in the very title of the play, exposing the self-deception of the representatives of the world and the inability of those in power to maintain their dominant position. It is concluded that in the play “The Happy Woman” Shchepkina-Kupernik managed to identify the most dramatic collisions of the era. Written between two revolutions, the play was a reflection of the situation in the country on the eve of the impending catastrophe.

Keywords

T.L. Shchepkina-Kupernik, Chekhov, drama conflict, drama dialogue, stage direction, pause.

For citation

Lyubivaya I.Yu. Premonition of disaster: The traditions of Chekhov’s drama in the play by T.L. ShchepkinaKupernik “Happy Woman”. Theatre. Fine Arts. Cinema. Music. 2022, no. 2, pp. 65–80.

DOI: 10.35852/2588-0144-2022-2-65-80

References

  1. Zhenskaya dramaturgiya Serebryanogo veka [Women’s dramaturgy of the Silver Age]. Saint Petersburg: Hyperion, 2009. 566 p. 
  2. Kuptsova O. “Zhenskij vopros” i “zhenskoe pis’mo” (Zhenskaya dramaturgiya Serebryanogo veka) [“Women’s Question” and “Women’s Writing” (Women’s Drama of the Silver Age)]. Oktyabr’ [October]. 2010, no. 7. Available from: https://magazines.gorky.media/october/2010/7/zhenskij-vopros-i-zhenskoe-pismo.html [Accessed 12/15/2021].
  3. Golubkova A.Rec.: Zhenskaya dramaturgiya Serebryanogo veka: Antologiya [Review: Women’s Drama of the Silver Age: An Anthology]. Znamya. 2010, no. 4. Available from: https:// magazines.gorky.media/znamia/2010/4/zhenskaya-dramaturgiya-serebryanogo-veka-antologiya.html [Accessed 12/15/2021]. 
  4. Nikolaev V.E. Premii Obshchestva russkih dramaticheskih pisatelej i kompozitorov [Prizes of the Society of Russian Dramatic Writers and Composers]. Pravo. Zakonodatel’stvo. Lichnost’ [Law. Legislation. Personality]. 2014, no. 2 (19), pp. 21–30. 
  5. Reyfild D. Zabytaya poetessa: Tat’yana L’vovna Shchepkina-Kupernik [Forgotten poetess: Tatyana Lvovna Shchepkina-Kupernik]. In: Shchepkina-Kupernik T.L. Izbrannyye stikhotvoreniya i poemy [Selected poems and poems]. Moscow: OGI, 2008, pp. 3–44. 
  6. Mikhailova M.V. “Milaya Tanya” [“Dear Tanya”]. Sovremennaya dramaturgiya [Modern dramaturgy]. 2009, no. 1, рр. 206–209. 
  7. Skibina O.M. Tvorchestvo Chekhova: poetika i prototipy (Lidiya Yаvorskaya i A.P. Chekhov) [Chekhov’s creativity: poetics and prototypes (Lydia Yavorskaya and A.P. Chekhov)]. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva. 2018, no. 2, рр. 129–140. 
  8. Shchepkina-Kupernik T.L. O Chekhove [About Chekhov]. In: A.P. Chekhov v vospominaniyakh sovremennikov [A.P. Chekhov in the memoirs of his contemporaries]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1986. 735 p. 
  9. Pis’mo D.I. Zaslavskogo T.L. Shchepkinoy-Kupernik [Letter from D.I. Zaslavsky to T.L. Shchepkina-Kupernik]. RGALI. F. 571, op. 1. Yed. khr. 574. 
  10. Mikhailova M.V. Chekhovskie motivy v dramaturgii T.L. Shchepkinoj-Kupernik [Chekhov’s motives in the dramaturgy of T.L. Shchepkina-Kupernik]. Slavic Almanac. The South African Journal for Slavic, Central and Eastern European Studies. 2010, no. 1, рр. 56–59. 
  11. Shchepkina-Kupernik T.L. Dni moej zhizni i drugie vospominaniya [Days of my life and other memories]. Moscow: Zakharov, 2005. 528 p.
  12. Leksina A.V. Roditeli i deti: problemy vospitatel’nogo ideala v p’esah Chekhova [Parents and children: problems of the educational ideal in Chekhov’s plays]. In: Chekhovskie chteniya v Yalte: Materialy XXXVIII Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “Izuchenie chekhovskogo naslediya na rubezhe vekov: vzglyad iz XXI stoletiya” [Chekhov readings in Yalta: Proceedings of the XXXVIII International scientific and practical conference “Studying Chekhov’s heritage at the turn of the century: a view from the XXI century”]. Simferopol: Tipografiya “Arial”, 2019, рр. 143–152. 
  13. Mikhailova M.V. “Baby s p’esami…” v epohu modern [“Women with plays…” in the modern era]. In: Zhenskaya dramaturgiya Serebryanogo veka: Antologiya [Women’s dramaturgy of the Silver Age: Anthology]. Saint Petersburg: Hyperion, 2009, pp. 5–60. 
  14. Koltonovskaya E.A. Zhenskie siluety: (Pisatel’nitcy i artistki) [Female silhouettes: (Writers and artists)]. Saint Petersburg: Prosveshchenie, 1912. 240 p.
  15. Sukhikh I.N. Struna zvenit v tumane [The string rings in the fog]. In: “Zvuk lopnuvshej struny”. Perechityvaya “Vishnevyj sad” A.P. Chekhova: Sbornik nauchnyh rabot [“The sound of a broken string”. Rereading “The Cherry Orchard” by A.P. Chekhov: Collection of Scientific Papers]. Simferopol: Izdatel’stvo “DOLYA” [Publishing house “DOLYA”], 2006, рр. 10–34.
  16. Skaftymov A.P. K voprosu o printsipakh postroyeniya p’yes A.P. Chekhova [To the question of the principles of construction of plays by A.P. Chekhov]. In: Poetika khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya [Poetics of a work of art]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 2007, рр. 367–396.
  17. Perepiska A.P. Chekhova: V 2 t. T. 1 [Correspondence of A.P. Chekhov: in 2 vols.]. Moscow: Hudozhestvennaya literatura, 1984. 447 p. 
  18. Golovacheva A.G. “Otdalennyj zvuk, tochno s neba” [“A distant sound, as if from the sky”]. In: “Zvuk lopnuvshej struny”. Perechityvaya “Vishnevyj sad” A.P. Chekhova: Sbornik nauchnyh rabot [“The sound of a broken string”. Rereading “The Cherry Orchard” by A.P. Chekhov: Collection of Scientific Papers]. Simferopol: Izdatel’stvo “DOLYA”, 2006, рр. 34–61. 
  19. Zorin A.N. Poetika remarki v russkoy dramaturgii XVIII–XIX vekov: avtoreferat dissertatsii… doktora filologicheskikh nauk [Poetics of stage direction in Russian dramaturgy of the 18th – 19th centuries: Dissertation thesis of D. Sc in Philology]. Saratov, 2010. 36 p. 
  20. Domansky Yu.V. Variativnost’ dramaturgii A.P. Chekhova [The variability of the dramaturgy of A.P. Chekhov]. Tver: Lilia Print, 2005. 160 p. 
  21. Panamareva A.N. Muzykal’nost’ v dramaturgii A.P. Chekhova: avtoreferat dissertatsii kandidata filologicheskikh nauk [Musicality in the dramaturgy of A.P. Chekhov. Dissertation thesis of Сand. Sc in Philology]. Tomsk, 2007. 22 p. 
  22. Domansky Yu.V. O drame i teatre: ot veka minuvshego k nyneshnemu veku [About drama and theatre: from the past century to the present century]. Moscow: Editus, 2021. 163 p.

Received: 18.12.2021

Revised: 23.03.2022

Accepted: 13.05.2022