Hedda Gabler on the Russian Stage: A Life Through Time
Abstract
The subject of the study is the perception and interpretation of the play Hedda Gabler, by
the Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen, which has been staged in theatres of Moscow and
St. Petersburg over the century. The study is based on critical reviews published in Moscow’s
press over the last century up to our time, as well as the author’s own impressions from some
performances of the early 21st century. Despite the fact that Hedda Gabler was staged
in Russian theatres more often than any other Ibsen play, it has continuously resulted in disputes and contradictory reviews, which often reflect both misunderstanding of the play itself and also of various director’s interpretations of it. In the pre-revolutionary period, on
the one hand, there were realistic productions staged, while others were made in the Art
Nouveau style of Vsevolod Meyerhold. According to critics, both ways to interpret the play
strayed far from the plot in Ibsen’s play. In Soviet times, Kama Ginkas interpreted the play
as a psychological drama. In the post-perestroika period, Nina Chusova and Mindaugas
Karbauskis offered simplified and even vulgarized versions of the play. In the author’s opinion, the performance which came closest to Ibsen’s idea and style for the play was created
by V. Pazi in Saint Petersburg State Academic Lensoviet Theatre. The reason for such difficulties in productions on the Russian stage is in the very nature of the drama, which ends with
the protagonist’s suicide. Such a finale is not logically motivated or conditioned by a total
inevitability, it is also not prepared for by the chain of events taking place on stage. With such
a finale, Ibsen altered the traditional structure and content of tragedy in its classical sense.
Keywords
Ibsen, Hedda Gabler, theatre interpretation, Russian theatre, poetics of a drama.
For citation
Odesskaya M. M. Hedda Gabler on the Russian Stage: A Life Through Time. Theatre. Fine Arts. Cinema. Music. 2022, no. 4, pp. 55–70.
DOI: 10.35852/2588-0144-2022-4-55-70
References
- Shakh-Azizova T.K. Uchast’ Valkirii: “Hedda Gabler” v sovremennom teatre [The Fate of the Valkyrie: “Hedda Gabler” at the modern theatre]. In: Novaya drama rubezha XIX–XX vekov: problematika, poetika, puti scenicheskogo voplosh’eniya [The new drama of the turn of the XIX–XX centuries: problems, poetics, ways of stage embodiment]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Sankt-Peterburgskoy gosudarstvennoy tearalnoy akademii, 2014, pp. 296–307.
- Saether A. Hedda Gabler: melankholiya i tvorchestvo [Hedda Gabler: On Meloncholy and Creativity]. In: Na rubezhe vekov. Rossiysko-Skandinavskiy literaturnyj dialog. Pod red. Odesskoy M. M., Chesnokovoy T. A. [At the turn of the century. Russian-Scandinavian literary Dialogue. Ed. by M.M. Odesskaya, T.A. Chesnokova]. Moscow: RGGU, 2001, pp. 227–240.
- Durbach E. Tragedija i romantizm v p’iesakh Ibsena, Strindberga, Chekhova [Tragedy and romanticism in the plays of Ibsen, Strindberg, Chekhov]. In: Ibsen, Strindberg, Chekhov. Ed. by M.M. Odesskaya. Moscow: RGGU, 2007, pp. 13–28.
- Mindaugas Karbauskis. Vash docug. 2004, December 25 – January 2, no. 51.
- Schiller I.H. F. Sobranie sochineniy: V 8 t. T. 5 [Collected works: In 8 vols. Vol. 5]. Moscow: Academia, 1950. 963 c.
- Hansen P. Ibsen i ego kritiki [Ibsen and his critics]. Severnyi vestnik, 1897, no. 52.
- Feigin Ya. A. Pis’ma o sovremennom iskussnve [Letters about contemporary art]. Russkaya mysl’, 1900, no. 2.
- Minsky N. Henrik Ibsen i ego p’iesy [Henrik Ibsen and his plays]. Severnyi vestnik, 1892, no. 10.
- Nemirovich- Danchenko V. I. Iz besedy s akterami pered nachalom repetitsiy p’iesy L.N. Andreeva “Anatema” [From a conversation with the actors before the rehearsals of L.N. Andreev’s play “Anathema”]. In: NemirovichDanchenko V.I. Teatral’noe nasledie: V 2 t. T. 1. Sost., red. V.Ya. Vilenkina [Theatrical heritage: In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Ed. & coll. by V. Ya. Vilenkina]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1952, pp. 118–120.
- Stanislavsky K.S. Sobranie sochineniy: V 8 t. T. 1 [Collected works: In 8 vols. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1954. 516 p.
- Russkoe Slovo, 1899, no. 81.
- An [Andreevich-Solovov E.A.] Sovremennoe iskusstvo [Modern art]. Russkoe slovo, 1899, v. 3.
- Moskovskie vedomosti. 1916, 11 noiabr’ia, no. 261.
- Titova G. V. Meyerhold i Komissarzhevskaya: modern na puti k uslovnomu teatru [Meyerhold and Komissarzhevskaya: Modernity on the way to a conventional theatre]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo St-Peterburgskoy gosudarstvennoy tearal’noy akademii, 2006. 176 p.
- Blok A. A. Dramaticheskiy teatr V.F. Komissarzhevskoy (Pis’mo iz Peterburga) [V.F. Komissarzhevskaya’s Dramatic Theatre (The Letter from St. Petersburg)]. In: Sobranie sochineniy: V 8 t. T. 5 [Collected works: In 8 vols. Vol. 5]. Moscow; Leningrad: Goslitizdat, 1962, pp. 95–97.
- Meyerhold v teatral’noy kritike. 1892–1918. Sostavlenie i kommentarii N.V. Pesochinskogo, E.A. Kukhty, N.A. Tarshis [Meyerhold in Russian theatre criticism. 1892–1918. Compilation and comments by N.V. Pesochinsky, E.A. Kukhtа, N.A. Tarshis]. Moscow: Artist, rezhisser, teatr, 1997. 528 p.
- Brunshteyn A. Y. Stranitzy proshlogo [Pages of the past]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1952. 309 p.
- Vladimirova Z.V. Lidiya Sukharevskaya [Lidiya Sukharevskaya]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1977, pp. 203–209.
- Heyberg H. Henrik Ibsen. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1975. 278 p.
- Yursky S. Yu. Igraya Ibsena [Playing Ibsen]. Voprosy literatury. 1985, no. 4, pp. 186–214.
- Shadronov V. V “Satirikone” pokazali l’iubov’, dovod’iash’uyuyu do rvoty [In the “Satyricon” theatre they showed love that leads to vomiting]. Komsomolskaya pravda. Prilozhenie, 2001, October 1.
- Davydova M. Deshevo, no so vkusom. V “Satirikone postavili “Geddu Gabler” [Cheap, but with teste. They staged “Hedda Gabler” at the “Satiricon” theatre]. Mir novostey. October 29.
- Show B. Kvintessentsiya ibsenizma (glavy iz knigi) [The Quintessence of Ibsenism (chapters from the book)]. In: B. Show. About Drama and Theatre. Moscow: Izdanel’stvo inostrannoy literatury, 1963. 640 p.
Received: 24.09.2022
Revised: 09.11.2022
Accepted: 14.11.2022